2006 Honda CR-V vs. 1965 Lotus 33
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus 33 (212 HP @ 10800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2006 Honda CR-V. (156 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus 33 should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 1536 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus 33. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1965 Lotus 33 has manual transmission. 1965 Lotus 33 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Honda CR-V | 1965 Lotus 33 | |
| Make | Honda | Lotus |
| Model | CR-V | 33 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 10800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1992 kg | 456 kg |
