2006 Honda CR-V vs. 1969 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda CR-V (157 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1969 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Zastava 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda CR-V (217 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Zastava 1500. 2006 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1969 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1969 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: