2006 Honda CR-V vs. 1978 Holden GTS
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Holden GTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Holden GTS would be higher. At 4,141 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Holden GTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Holden GTS (158 HP @ 4550 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Honda CR-V. (156 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Holden GTS should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 517 kg more than 1978 Holden GTS.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Holden GTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Holden GTS (327 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda CR-V. (217 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1978 Holden GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda CR-V | 1978 Holden GTS | |
Make | Honda | Holden |
Model | CR-V | GTS |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 4141 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4550 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 327 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1992 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |