2006 Honda CR-V vs. 1982 Mazda 626
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,204 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 653 kg more than 1982 Mazda 626.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Honda CR-V | 1982 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | CR-V | 626 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2204 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1698 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2520 mm |
