2006 Honda CR-V vs. 1995 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda CR-V (156 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1995 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1995 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 192 kg more than 1995 Mercury Villager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mercury Villager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda CR-V | 1995 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Honda | Mercury |
Model | CR-V | Villager |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1992 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2860 mm |