2006 Honda CR-V vs. 2000 Honda FCX
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda CR-V (157 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 1150 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda FCX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda CR-V. (217 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Honda CR-V | 2000 Honda FCX | |
| Make | Honda | Honda |
| Model | CR-V | FCX |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 273 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |
