2006 Honda CR-V vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2006 Honda CR-V. (149 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 151 kg more than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda CR-V. (190 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda CR-V | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | CR-V | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 383 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 87 L |