2006 Honda CR-V vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda CR-V | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | CR-V | Pixo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2360 mm |