2006 Honda CR-V vs. 2012 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2006 Honda CR-V. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda CR-V.

Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda CR-V. (340 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda CR-V. 2012 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2006 Honda CR-V has manual transmission. 2006 Honda CR-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: