2006 Honda Element vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Honda Element. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Honda Element would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Element (156 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Element should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 Honda Element is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Element will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda Element. (217 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda Element.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda Element | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Honda | Holden |
Model | Element | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |