2006 Honda Element vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Honda Element. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Honda Element would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda Element is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2006 Honda Element. (156 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda Element.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda Element. (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda Element.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Honda Element 2009 Mazda CX-7
Make Honda Mazda
Model Element CX-7
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Crossover SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2360 cc 2261 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 156 HP 235 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 217 Nm 351 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99 mm 94 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4330 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 12.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 69 L