2006 Honda Fit vs. 1977 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2006 Honda Fit is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1977 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Honda Fit has automatic transmission and 1977 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1977 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Honda Fit will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda Fit | 1977 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Honda | Zastava |
Model | Fit | 1500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |