2006 Honda Integra vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Honda Integra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 2006 Honda Integra has manual transmission. 2006 Honda Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda Integra | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Integra | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4374 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1725 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1394 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |