2006 Honda Jazz vs. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 2006 Honda Jazz is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2006 Honda Jazz. (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda Jazz weights approximately 60 kg more than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Because 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda Jazz | 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
Make | Honda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Jazz | 300 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 71 L |