2006 Honda Jazz vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2006 Honda Jazz is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2006 Honda Jazz. (77 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda Jazz.
Because 1964 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Honda Jazz | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Honda | Plymouth |
| Model | Jazz | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1339 cc | 2789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
