2006 Honda Pilot vs. 1943 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2006 Honda Pilot is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Pilot (244 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Pilot should accelerate faster than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10.
Because 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Pilot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Honda Pilot has automatic transmission and 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 has manual transmission. 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Honda Pilot will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda Pilot | 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | Pilot | PV 801-10 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1943 |
Engine Size | 3474 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3260 mm |