2006 Honda Ridgeline vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2006 Honda Ridgeline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Honda Ridgeline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Ridgeline (247 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Ridgeline should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 517 kg more than 2006 Honda Ridgeline.
Because 2006 Honda Ridgeline is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Ridgeline will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda Ridgeline (332 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2006 Honda Ridgeline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda Ridgeline | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Honda | Lancia |
Model | Ridgeline | Nea |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 853 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2590 mm |