2006 Hummer H3 vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 2006 Hummer H3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 3,457 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hummer H3 (220 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Hummer H3 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Hummer H3 | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
Make | Hummer | Jeep |
Model | H3 | CJ2A |
Year Released | 2006 | 1949 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3457 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2040 mm |