2006 Hummer H3 vs. 1962 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2006 Hummer H3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,457 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hummer H3 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Because 2006 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Hummer H3 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Hummer H3 | 1962 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Hummer | Lotus |
| Model | H3 | Elan |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3457 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 45 L |
