2006 Hummer H3 vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2006 Hummer H3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 3,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hummer H3 (220 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 2006 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Hummer H3 (306 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Hummer H3 | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Hummer | Reliant |
| Model | H3 | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 38 L |
