2006 Hummer H3 vs. 2002 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2006 Hummer H3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 3,457 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hummer H3 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2002 SsangYong Musso. (217 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 2002 SsangYong Musso.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 305 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Hummer H3 | 2002 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Hummer | SsangYong |
Model | H3 | Musso |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3457 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 16.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 73 L |