2006 Hummer H3 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Hummer H3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Hummer H3 would be higher. At 3,457 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hummer H3 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Malibu. (170 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Malibu.

Because 2006 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Hummer H3 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Malibu. (214 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2006 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Malibu.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Hummer H3 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
Make Hummer Chevrolet
Model H3 Malibu
Year Released 2006 2010
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3457 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 220 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 214 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 5200 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4750 mm 4872 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1786 mm
Vehicle Height 1880 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2852 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 11.8 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 L 61 L