2006 Hummer H3 vs. 2010 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Hummer H3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Hummer H3 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Hummer H3. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Hummer H3.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover LR2 (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Hummer H3. (306 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Hummer H3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Hummer H3 | 2010 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | Hummer | Land Rover |
| Model | H3 | LR2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 317 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1908 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2659 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 70 L |
