2006 Hummer H3 vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Hummer H3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Hummer H3 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2006 Hummer H3. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2006 Hummer H3.
Because 2006 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Nissan Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Hummer H3. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Hummer H3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Hummer H3 | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Hummer | Nissan |
Model | H3 | Z |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3457 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1326 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 72 L |