2006 Hyundai Atos vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Hyundai Atos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Hyundai Atos would be higher. At 1,086 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Hyundai Atos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hyundai Atos (60 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Atos should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Hyundai Atos weights approximately 850 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Atos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Hyundai Atos (87 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Hyundai Atos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano. 2006 Hyundai Atos has automatic transmission and 2012 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2012 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Hyundai Atos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Hyundai Atos | 2012 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Hyundai | Tata |
| Model | Atos | Nano |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1086 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 67 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 37 L |
