2006 Hyundai Elantra vs. 1989 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2006 Hyundai Elantra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 ZIL 4104 (312 HP) has 174 more horse power than 2006 Hyundai Elantra. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 2006 Hyundai Elantra.
Because 1989 ZIL 4104 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 ZIL 4104. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Elantra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 ZIL 4104 (607 Nm) has 423 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Hyundai Elantra. (184 Nm). This means 1989 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Hyundai Elantra.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Hyundai Elantra | 1989 ZIL 4104 | |
Make | Hyundai | ZIL |
Model | Elantra | 4104 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 7690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 312 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 607 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 108 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.5 mm | 104.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2100 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3890 mm |