2006 Hyundai Getz vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Hyundai Getz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Hyundai Getz would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Hyundai Getz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hyundai Getz (104 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Getz should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Hyundai Getz weights approximately 502 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Getz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Hyundai Getz (143 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Hyundai Getz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano. 2006 Hyundai Getz has automatic transmission and 2012 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2012 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Hyundai Getz will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Hyundai Getz | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Hyundai | Tata |
Model | Getz | Nano |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 143 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 176 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1102 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 37 L |