2006 Hyundai Matrix vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2006 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hyundai Matrix (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 294 kg more than 2006 Hyundai Matrix.
Because 1953 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Hyundai Matrix | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Hyundai | Talbot |
Model | Matrix | Baby |
Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3130 mm |