2006 Hyundai Matrix vs. 2010 Pontiac G3
To start off, 2010 Pontiac G3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. Both 2006 Hyundai Matrix and 2010 Pontiac G3 are equipped with a 1,599 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Pontiac G3 (105 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Hyundai Matrix. (103 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Pontiac G3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Hyundai Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Pontiac G3 (142 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Hyundai Matrix. (141 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Pontiac G3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Hyundai Matrix | 2010 Pontiac G3 | |
Make | Hyundai | Pontiac |
Model | Matrix | G3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |