2006 Hyundai Matrix vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2006 Hyundai Matrix. (103 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2006 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 473 kg more than 2006 Hyundai Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 459 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Hyundai Matrix. (141 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Hyundai Matrix. 2012 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2006 Hyundai Matrix has manual transmission. 2006 Hyundai Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Hyundai Matrix | 2012 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Hyundai | Jaguar |
| Model | Matrix | XJ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.7 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1796 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5127 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3157 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 82 L |
