2006 Hyundai Panel Van vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Hyundai Panel Van. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Hyundai Panel Van would be higher. At 2,607 cc, 2006 Hyundai Panel Van is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Hyundai Panel Van is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Hyundai Panel Van. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Hyundai Panel Van. (167 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Hyundai Panel Van.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Hyundai Panel Van | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Hyundai | Mazda |
| Model | Panel Van | 3 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Panel Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2607 cc | 2000 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |
