2006 Hyundai Panel Van vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Hyundai Panel Van. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Hyundai Panel Van would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (377 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Hyundai Panel Van. (167 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Hyundai Panel Van.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Hyundai Panel Van | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Hyundai | Chevrolet |
| Model | Panel Van | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Panel Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2607 cc | 3600 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 319 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 377 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 22.4:1 | 11.5 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 72 L |
