2006 Isuzu Ascender vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu Ascender. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu Ascender would be higher. At 4,195 cc, 2006 Isuzu Ascender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu Ascender (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (265 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu Ascender (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu Ascender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT. 2006 Isuzu Ascender has automatic transmission and 2010 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2010 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Isuzu Ascender will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu Ascender | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Isuzu | Audi |
| Model | Ascender | TT |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2000 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 291 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4199 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1351 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |
