2006 Isuzu Ascender vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu Ascender. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu Ascender would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Isuzu Ascender is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu Ascender weights approximately 423 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 2006 Isuzu Ascender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu Ascender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu Ascender | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
Model | Ascender | C30 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1874 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 3.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |