2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 1959 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-280 should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu I-280 weights approximately 830 kg more than 1959 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Isuzu I-280. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (180 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-280 | 1959 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
Model | I-280 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 3153 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1350 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2060 mm |