2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,801 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (175 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-280 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu I-280 weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-280 | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
Model | I-280 | Celeste |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1410 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2350 mm |