2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,801 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (202 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu I-280 weights approximately 915 kg more than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (258 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
| Make | Isuzu | Maserati |
| Model | I-280 | Bi Turbo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2801 cc | 2491 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2510 mm |
