2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover (188 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 80 kg more than 2006 Isuzu I-280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Isuzu I-280. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover (320 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.

Compare all specifications: