2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM would be higher. At 5,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM (664 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 489 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM (773 Nm) has 522 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | I-280 | CLK LM |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 5000 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 664 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 773 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |
