2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK (190 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | I-280 | SLK |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3199 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 16.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |
