2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2002 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XK8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XK8 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2002 Jaguar XK8 | |
Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
Model | I-280 | XK8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 4195 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 16.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 75 L |