2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (112 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-280 should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
| Model | I-280 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2184 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |
