2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2004 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2004 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-280 should accelerate faster than 2004 Smart ForTwo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2004 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Isuzu | Smart |
| Model | I-280 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 799 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 3.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 22 L |
