2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2007 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2007 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Hardbody. (168 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-280 should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Hardbody.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Hardbody (265 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2007 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
| Model | I-280 | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3275 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 14.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 84 L |
