2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,801 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu I-280 weights approximately 32 kg more than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Isuzu I-280. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
| Model | I-280 | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2801 cc | 2499 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1978 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |
