2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,801 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu I-280 weights approximately 650 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
| Model | I-280 | Condor |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1812 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |
