2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2008 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2008 Toyota RunX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,801 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu I-280 weights approximately 858 kg more than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu I-280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota RunX. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2008 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
Model | I-280 | RunX |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |