2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2009 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2009 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
| Model | I-280 | XJ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 4200 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 297 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 85 L |
