2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (141 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-280 should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (187 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2009 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Isuzu | Kia |
| Model | I-280 | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1975 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 53 L |
