2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2009 Kia Rondo
To start off, 2009 Kia Rondo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Rondo (176 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Rondo should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Rondo. (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Rondo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2009 Kia Rondo | |
Make | Isuzu | Kia |
Model | I-280 | Rondo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2359 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 229 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |